The Conclusive Aspect of Brain Fingerprinting and the Doctrine of The Judge's Personal Belief in Criminal Cases.

Abstract

In the context of scientific advancements, various methodologies have emerged that significantly impact the domain of criminal evidence. Among these, the brain fingerprinting technique stands out, as it utilizes information retained in the human brain regarding a committed crime to assess an individual's connection to it. Although the outcomes derived from brain fingerprint testing are highly reliable, the criminal judge retains the discretionary power to consider this scientific evidence alongside other forms of evidence. The overarching principle governing evidence is the autonomy of the criminal judge to arrive at a personal conviction, guided by certain constraints that govern this freedom. Consequently, the judge must navigate the delicate balance between respecting the sanctity of an individual's private life and serving the public interest.